Chris's Retirement Blog

Friday, September 21, 2018

Blog #7: Women's Titles, Jury Duty, Precarious Employment, and Penis Envy (again)




BLOG #7: Women’s Titles, Jury Duty, Precarious Employment, and Penis Envy (again)



Today, September 21, marks three months since I left SAIT and semi-retired. I have to admit that I am still processing how I feel about moving from being a fully employed person to an unemployed person (because being retired is being unemployed in the traditional sense). I still feel as though I am on a long vacation, and I expect that won’t change until I return from England at the end of October.



WOMEN’s TITLES



A couple of weeks ago I was on 17 Avenue SW meeting a group of fabulous women for brunch. This was the height of summer so pretty summer dresses and sandals, shorts, muscle shirts were normal attire for most folks at this point and it was blisteringly hot by 10:00.  I  was arriving at a rather upscale establishment, and I was the first to arrive. The doorperson greeted me and called me Ma’am. Thereafter, however, the wait staff called me Miss.


Put aside traditional titles for woman with respect to their marital status (and this assumes they aren’t using a professional title such as doctor or reverend/pastor/rabbi, etc.). I don’t wear a wedding band so there’s no traditional and obvious clue to my marital status, and I use “Miss” rather than “Ms” as my title, but I got to wondering at what point does a woman change from a Miss to a Ma’am or Madam? For example, what clues are there for people that one might call a 22 year old woman “Miss,” but refer to that same 22 year old woman pushing a stroller as “Ma’am”?



Were the wait staff trying to be polite to an obviously matronly woman thinking calling me “Miss” would make me feel better?



What’s going on?



You’ll notice that men don’t ever change their titles.



Perhaps we need a new title for retired persons who are female. Open to suggestions on this one.



JURY DUTY (and ageism)



Discrimination takes many shapes and forms and ageism is just one of those forms . . . and the latest example for me is to discover that I become exempt from jury duty once I turn 65. Why? Does my brain suddenly atrophy at 65? Why at 64 am I considered capable but suddenly at 65 I am not.



I’m pondering on this piece of information because  I recently received a summons for jury duty, and if I’m called to be assessed for jury duty, I’m not sure if I should work hard to demonstrate that I am cognitively and physically capable of performing my civic duty or if I should just let bias have its way and use this as a get-out-of-jail-free card (pun intended) so I can avoid jury duty.



PRECARIOUS EMPLOYMENT:



I’ve been thinking a lot recently about how my reentry into the workforce will take place and in what format it’ll be. Coffee with a friend really got me thinking about minimum wage (in Alberta this goes up to $15/hour this October) and what type of work I want to do. My friend mentioned that she didn’t think she could/would work for minimum wage. I have to ask myself, “Would I?”



The term “precarious employment” has entered our lexicon in the last few years.



In terms of precarious employment, I have my daughter’s mid-twenties  friends and coworkers to gauge by, so my observations are hardly scientific. What I observe is that very few of them have been or are currently enrolled in post-secondary courses/programs that would lead to professional positions and that most are under employed, employed part-time, or  employed part-time and working two or more jobs. This is not a criticism of their life choices, merely an observation and a convenient platform into observations about employment. Leap back about 25 years and long before the term “precarious employment” was coined, and I was working as a part-time contract instructor. Now, it’s a sad fact that many post-secondary instructors/professors start out their careers as casual or sessional instructors. This is also the time when these folks are establishing their careers, paying back student loans, possibly looking at settling down (think mortgage, partner, children).  It’s also a sad fact that for budget management reasons many institutions take advantage of this group of folks. I know, I was there for seven years . . . although, to be fair, I also had a baby/toddler at the time and working part-time somewhat worked to my advantage. But looking back on this experience I realize that apart from these seven years of very iffy employment, most of my work has been full-time work that included a decent salary, employer benefits, and a pension plan, and those features definitely lift a job out of the realm of precarious employment.



So, here I am on a short-term contract working part-time as a provincial enumerator for minimum wage. I’m enjoying the work, actually. I can tell you that your provincial government is working very hard on your behalf to ensure that you can exercise your right to vote. This contract provides me with a purpose for my daily walking, I get to work by myself with not a committee in sight,  I’m getting to know a part of Calgary I didn’t know existed except in passing,  and the money I earn will pay for the plants in my new Chinook-hardy flower garden. On one side of my zone are multi-million dollar homes with gorgeous front gardens and high-end vehicles parked on the streets and up the driveways . . . and on the other side of my zone are dwellings where the occupants are clearly struggling financially and the vehicles are what one might refer to as beaten up bangers. No judgement on my part (I hope) . . . sometimes it takes a while to establish oneself and one must live the way one needs to in order to make ends meet. But I couldn’t help reflecting that many of the folks on the “wrong side of the road” are probably precariously employed and also that if I weren’t retired how I, too, would qualify as being precariously employed. I’ve also been chewing on how many hours at minimum wage it’s going to take me to earn around $450.00 (around 30 hours) and how quickly I could have earned $450.00 working in education.



This knowledge won’t stop me from taking on other short-term, minimum wage positions if they interest me because there is at least one big advantage: limited responsibility . . . limited responsibility from me around organization and planning vs. actually doing of the job.



And I’ve been chewing on this new knowledge a lot recently. Not that I’ve arrived at any logical answer, but the chewing in itself is interesting as I’m having to confront a whole bunch of assumptions about the value of work, value of a profession, value we as a society place on different professions. And having the opportunity to walk around two very different communities divided only by one road has got me thinking about life choices, access to opportunities, taking advantage of opportunities, expectations of oneself, what career decisions I might have made if I hadn’t made my way into education. And I’m beginning to wonder if my return to work will be back into education (either teaching or curriculum work) or whether or not it will take some totally unexpected shape that I haven’t even considered.





PENIS ENVY (again):



September in Calgary has seen below average temperatures  and some snow (anything from a skiff to a dump depending where in the province one lives). Our normal daytime temperatures this time of year are around +15C to +18C . . . not hovering around zero. September has really been the month that didn’t happen. This follows a blisteringly hot and incredibly dry summer and weeks of forest fire smoke from British Columbia limiting outdoor activities.



This abrupt change in weather and temperatures has proved difficult for the horses who are in the process of changing coats . . . which means they are still shedding their summer coats and have grown only the start of their fall coats (which, by November will be heavier winter coats).



What does this have to do with penis envy? . . . hang in there, I’ll get to it.



So, horses who are not normally rugged at this time of year are already in rugs or at least wearing rugs till the weather normalizes, and horsey humans are dragging out every piece of barn clothing so they can stay warm when working with their equid buddies.



In addition, in my work as a provincial enumerator till the end of September,  I’m bundled up like the Michelin Tyre man as I complete my routes.



All of which has got me looking for my long johns, Stanfords, woolly combinations – whatever you choose to call them.



Are you starting to see the connection?



So, woolly combinations for men: often all one piece so the waist band area never gets cold . . . possibly with a bum flap for more serious stuff, but still minimizing exposure to the cold . . . and a fly to, again, ummmm minimize exposure to the cold.



Check out the union suits (a new term for me) from the LLBean catalogue https://www.llbean.com/llb/shop/47356?page=two-layer-union-suit-men-s&bc=12-26&feat=Long%20Underwear-SR0&csp=f&searchTerm=Long%20Underwear (and a word of caution: if you are going looking for woolly combinations online, please be careful just which website you select to look at!!!!!). 






Women’s combinations: ummmmm, well, unless a woman wants to divest herself of snow suit equipment, several woolly sweaters and such, a one-piece combination would require that she completely undresses in order to pee and that means maximum exposure to the cold. Which is probably why women have two-piece combinations . . . but there’s still a lot of skin exposed just to take a whiz. And let’s not forget that younger women are often managing small children (also wearing multiple layers of clothing) in public bathrooms, so that adds another layer of complication.



Gentlemen, once again . . . please realize just how lucky you are. . . and please give some thought to your horsey women friends as we manage our combinations.



And on a side note, have you ever noticed that no character in a novel ever has to visit the facilities? Recently I was reading a futuristic novel (and like all futuristic novels it was depressing, bleak, and not at all positive), and the protagonist had to pee, outside, in the forest, and she was worried about privacy and getting her boots wet (refer back to Blog #6 if you don’t get the reference). I wish I’d noted the exact paragraph and the protagonist’s comments. Good job she wasn’t also coping with her woolly combinations.





MISCELLANEOUS



Recently I was watching one of Rick Steves’s travel programs. This was part of PBS’s drive for viewer funding, and Mr. Steves mentioned that his travels abroad to exotic countries were, in some ways, safer than staying at home. Tactful, careful, and mindful of his audience, Mr. Steves’s comments were still pointedly obvious (he is American) and his feelings about his current government were all the more powerful for his tactful, understated comments. I will keep his comments about the safety of travelling abroad in mind as I shall shortly be packing for a month-long stay in the British Isles.



Even though I don’t have my birth year plugged into my Facebook profile, its algorithm (?) must be picking up on comments about retirement because a lot of the pop-up adverts are to do with things of interest to retired persons. This got me thinking about a book I recently picked up at the library. I tried (unsuccessfully, again) to read a book by Catharina Ingelman-Sundberg. This one is called The Little Old Lady Behaving Badly, and it’s translated into English from Swedish. I love the title! Despite loving the concept of a gang of old folks plotting to and then successfully robbing banks to support their charitable endeavours, I’ve not been able to get into the two books I’ve tried reading. Not that I’m considering a post-retirement move to a life of crime, but I do love the concept of elderly folks behaving badly.

















I’ve been spending rather a lot of time at SAIT recently  dropping off or picking up my currently carless daughter from her photography courses. Somehow, in the last three months, I have managed to completely disconnect myself from campus and I feel no more than I would feel moving around Mount Royal University’s or University of Calgary’s campuses. Which is a tad odd because I’ve spent so much time and so many years on campus. Next week, I’m on campus visiting and lunching, so it’ll be interesting to see if I feel any different or if I feel like an outsider? Odd that a place that took up some much of my emotional and intellectual energy now neither takes anything from me nor gives anything to me.





. . . and in the category of things I can now do:



1.      Popping out to the barn for an appointment with the farrier (blacksmith) on a weekday without booking a flex day or vacation day or negotiating with a barn buddy to bring the horses in for me.

2.      Running out to a hardware store during the quieter weekday hours (in this particular case shopping for some wood).

3.      Rolling over in bed and going back to sleep because it’s still dark/cold/wet/miserable out. Now if I could only train my Canadian husband and Canadian daughter that the British idea of bringing mum tea in bed is acceptable in Canada.

4.      Playing Mum’s Taxi Service without having to negotiate days off work or juggling work commitments because my daughter Heather was recently involved in a traffic incident. She’s okay (we’re still not sure about her car, though), but having one parental unit to drive her around to various medical appointments is a big bonus and clearly a bonus linked of my being semi-retired.



How did we move so very quickly from hot, sunny, long summer days of summer dresses and sandals to the cold, crisp, short fall (autumn) days where I’m thinking of woolly combinations? Is there a parallel here between moving from being a full-employed professional to a semi-retired/ unemployed person and moving from summer to fall?